Ditch the iPad 3: These 5 Gadgets Do Exactly What You Want

Posted in Saving Money , Savings Account • March 16, 2012

Apple iPad 3Photo Courtesy of Engadget

The unveiling of the iPad 3, dubbed “the new iPad,” along with its updated features may tempt Apple fans to sacrifice their savings account in order to own the latest-and-greatest gadget on the market come the iPad 3 release date on March 16. However, at over $500, the cost of an iPad 3 easily puts a damper on finances.

While the new iPad has a catch-all appeal in terms of functionality, it forces consumers to compromise in many areas. For example, it has a range of applications like taking pictures, playing games and web-browsing, but it isn’t particularly the best at performing these functions because the new iPad 3 isn’t a dedicated camera, gaming console or laptop.

Further, it’s not necessarily an ideal product for those with serious budget constraints or for enthusiasts of a specific field seeking out the most optimal device in their niche.

Better Buys Than the iPad 3

Continued product innovations continue to make Apple stock explosive. However, consumers who fall into the two aforementioned buckets should resist Apple’s magnetic lure by exploring smarter purchases based on their personal needs.

Shoppers who are solely interested in a single feature offered by the iPad 3 can save hundreds of dollars simply by avoiding the hype and being realistic about their intentions. These products can outperform the new iPad based on their implied use.

1. For the Shutterbug: Olympus PEN E-PM1 (About $499)

An admirable facet of the iPad 3 is its portability. The 3rd-generation iPad boasts a 5-megapixel camera with similar attributes as the iPhone 4S, but it simply does not provide the control that a devoted camera offers.

Bulky SLR cameras of yonder-year are not ideal for transport. Luckily, new micro four thirds (MFT) systems have made traditional SLR size a burden of the past. MFT products like the Olympus PEN E-PM1 provide photographers with a compact option (e.g. collapsible lens mechanism) for capturing shots without compromising the integrity of the image.

 

iPad 3 Alternative Olympus PEN E-PM1

With 12-megapixels, a 14-42mm M.Zuiko zoom lens included and 3-inch LCD display, the Olympus PEN E-PM1 caters to both novice and advanced photographers so there’s less chance of outgrowing this model.

The price tag stands at about the same cost of an iPad, but excels beyond the capabilities of the iPad’s camera, making this a smart investment for those looking to get serious in the world of photography.

2. For the Bookworm: Kindle ($79)

Avid readers can save a significant amount of money by opting for a classic Amazon Kindle instead of the new iPad. Not only is the Kindle an incredible steal at a low $79 ($109 without ads), it’s actually smaller than its Apple rival.

The compact 6″ screen can be toted in pants pockets, while keeping to a readable size. Speaking of readable, while the unveiling of the new iPad has confirmed the much speculated Retina display, the Kindle’s E-ink text layout prevents long-term vision issues other electronic devices are known to present.

iPad 3 Alternative Kindle

The Kindle also has Wi-Fi built-in so users can remain productive by checking e-mail and downloading PDF documents on the device. As the direct e-reader competitor of Apple, Amazon provides consumers with an economic e-reader that is no frills and all functionality.

3. For the Audiophile: iPod Nano 16GB ($149)

Music lovers on-the-go should pass on the new iPad 3 as an audio storage device. At a fraction of the cost of an iPad, listeners can purchase the Apple iPod nano.

Yes, this is yet another Apple product, but Apple pioneered portable music players and took them further than any other company. It only makes sense that they would have the most competitive audio gadget in the tech sphere.

iPad 3 Alternative iPod Nano

The iPod Nano 16GB can store up to 4,000 songs for an expansive playlist suited for even the most music-minded shopper. It also offers fitness functions like Fitness Walk + Run support and Nike+ support, in addition to an FM radio.

4. For the Web-Surfer: HP 2000-299WM Notebook ($399)

The HP 2000-299WM Notebook is a more practical option for casual internet surfers than the iPad 3. Aside from saving $100 or more, a laptop remains fairly lightweight. This particular model is at a mobile 5.5 lbs, making it easy to transport in a bag to work, school or for use on the couch.

 

iPad 3 Alternative HP 2000-299WM Notebook

A 15.6″ display makes web-browsing more convenient (i.e. less constant scrolling up, down and side-to-side). It also is effective at providing more for the money by making research easier to conduct with a full keyboard and by doubling as a DVD player. Overall, this is a budget-friendly alternative to the new iPad 3.

5. For the Gamer: Xbox 360 250GB with Kinect ($399)

Those who want to join the gaming elite can save a couple hundred dollars by steering clear of the new iPad. Instead, the Xbox 360 with Kinect gives players an exceptional gaming experience with impeccable graphics and an online community that makes playing against friends and family hyper-engaging.

iPad 3 Alternative Xbox 360 250GB with Kinect

The Xbox 360 also caters to a range of ages thanks to games like Fruit Ninja for younger children to Modern Warfare 3 for hardcore gamers.

The Ultimate Question: Should I Buy an iPad?

Regardless of these practical alternatives to the new iPad, “Should I Buy an iPad?” is likely not a question for Apple addicts. However, consumers browsing retails aisles should reconsider, especially if their financial resources are strapped.

One thing to keep in mind, for those leaning toward buying the iPad — Apple will only continue to innovate and within a year the new iPad will be another obsolete product sitting in the dark recesses of a desk drawer.

For many, deciding whether or not to claim the new iPad 3 as their own comes down to personal priorities: Owning a trendy gadget or paying the rent.

Get great information like this every week with the GoBankingRates newsletter

We would love to hear your comments and feedback

  • feloneouscat

    Uh, this is probably the silliest article I’ve read to date:

    a) five devices instead of one – wow, talk about a step backwards
    b) have you even LOOKED at a Kindle? No comparison – the text on it is horrible compared to the iPad 3
    c) iPod nano… okaaay…
    d) laptop… wait… why do I need to buy a kindle, a ipod or a game system?
    e) Xbox isn’t portable. Period. Not unless you plan on lugging a flat screen TV with you as well.

    I would love to see a pic of you lugging all of this stuff around (including the flat screen TV and I guess a 120V generator for the XBox).

  • Kevin

    Wow! So I can spend over $1500 buying these suggested devices instaed of buying an iPad.
    Oh, but wait…I have a camera already, and I get to fumble around with it to get my pics into an email.
    I have a Asus Netbook too…the battery is junk so I have this great little bitty screen and keyboard I have to keep plugged into AC power.
    I already have a Nook Color and the screen size makes it useful only in Portrait mode, also as heavy as it is my hand gets sore holding it up for hours while reading.
    I have an MP3 player too. Just as clunking getting my new music onto it and no way do just download.
    So I sprung for the new iPad.
    Now I can sell all the rest of my junk on eBay, I don’t expect to get much, but hey it’s ok. Would you like to know why?
    Because what I have on my iMac, on my iPhone, on my MacBook Pro and now my iPad are seamlessly syncronized. Music, Pictures, Apps, email, ebooks….everything!
    So kewl!
    But hey each to thier own. I have no regrets.
    Anybody want to buy some good used “JUNK”? It’s all obsolete but it works (somewhat).

  • jason

    I don’t have a iPhone, iPad, or mac, and this is a really stupid article as explained in the first two responses. Does your editor read English and understand how to add?

  • bRowNies

    huh? ditch the iPad for 5 devices and spend also more? huh?

  • rs

    Huh…. Jennifer, I hope you have a better day or night job. Of all you “suggestions” the net book one makes me laugh. The whole point of a tablet is a new form factor for accessing web content. A netbook/laptop is for those who like to sit bolted upright to a chair. This is a very vapid attemp at education for the public.

  • Read properly

    As most above have failed to read the article, I fear it has to be pointed out to them that the author is pointing towards the fact that some people are getting an iPad for only one purpose.

    The author then suggest better specific tools for said single purpose.

    You get an iPad only to take pictures (ok, that one got me fooled, but sure, I’ll bite), get this great camera; you get much more quality for the price.

    Want an eReader, save $400.00 and get a purpose-specific one.

    Want to do multiple tasks, you might consider the iPad as useful. But as pointed out, the iPad it a Jack-of-all-trades… and master of none. (Except lining up crowds of gullible buyers)

    Personally being against all things Apple, given they’re overpriced designed-to-be-obsolete technology (…next iPad will have same pixel density as their phone and a new batch of fools lining up, lol!), I would look into something else, but that is my opinion. I know alot of people love their products for their ease of use.

  • Jennifer Calonia

    I appreciate everyone’s feedback.

    The purpose of this article is to achieve two things: 1) guide shoppers who will inevitably find themselves using only one feature of the iPad (and who are not interested in the Jack of all trades appeal that the iPad presents) to an alternative product that performs its single function better, 2) help these specific consumers save money in the process.

    The iPad may be a great catch-all product for those who truly want the benefits of internet browsing, gaming, facetime, etc. — but not everyone wants or needs these capabilities. If you know that you do want these features, you clearly already know that this article doesn’t apply to you.

    P.s. For those who have inquired: Yes, I own a Kindle, and as an e-reader I find it does a superior job at keeping my 20/20 vision intact.

  • Chinmoy Mitra

    I agree with most of the views here…this article is really stupid!
    Consider the suggestion of buying an Olympus camera instead of iPad for photography purpose. How can some one make such a stupid, idiotic suggestion? For “those looking to get serious in the world of photography” are not going to buy an iPad with its huge screen and 5 megapixel camera for professional fashion photography or National Geographic level wild life photography. The iPad’s 5MP camera (and mind you, 5MP is not to laugh about.I have a 5MP Fujifilm S-5600 with which I have taken hundreds of stunning photos) is for casual photos. On top of that, the suggestion to buy the Olympus camera at such a price is ridiculous! Compare the specs of the Fujifilm S-3300 with it….at a lesser price you are getting 14MP against 12MP, 26X optical zoom against 3X, and loads and loads of other features.
    So an iPad is an iPad, is an iPad…..someone who wants to buy an iPad will definitely buy it even if he has a $1000 Canon SLR in his bag. Get the point?

  • David Payne

    The article makes a valid point for those few who only want to do one thing, but still perpetuates bogus history. Not only did Apple not pioneer portable music players (eg. Sony was DECADES earlier) but Apple did not even pioneer MP3 players. Apple have often been among the early manufacturers but never first, unless you go out of your way to define a category to get the answer you want ie defining “personal computer” to exclude Whirlwind, Kenbak-1, Micral-N, EDUC-8, IBM 5100, Altair 8800, Kim 1, etc.

  • http://www,mgbs.biz Shree

    How come the author hasn’t made a gadget-to-gadget comparison at the end of his conclusion? He has started relating to cost of purchase and then at the end did not even sum it up with different combinations for readers to benefit from. It could easily show what is worth and what isn’t. Quite a lost opportunity I would say..and all it creates is doubt among the readers regardless of what plan or combination is better when it comes to out of pocket investment.

  • Josh

    Nice. Spend $1500 to carry around 5 separate items when one small integrated device will do all 5 tasks more than adequately for 1/3rd the price. Fantastic logic, Ms. Calonia. It’s almost like telling someone to spend $2M to buy up a lake house, ski villa, permanent residence, parking garage and office when they can just buy one lake front house in the Rockies that will have all five features. Equally illogical and makes just as poor of a basis for a news article.

  • AnnMarie Barnes

    This piece is such a waster of space and time. My mouth was open, when I started reading this. You can not believe that anything in this piece would possibly make any sense to the consumer. Why would you buy all of those items singularly – as a competitive choice for purchasing an ipad 3. Oh I get it….this is really 5 advertisements, disguised as an informtive article. Shame on you!

  • Scott Pearson

    I don’t get it…is this a pro-iPad article in disguise? After reading this “article” it makes me even happier that I decided to get one. You mean I can have all of these capabilities inside one device that is thinner and smaller than a magazine? We have known this since 2010 right? nice article…

  • Elias

    Ditch the Journalist. These Five Elementary students will write a better article.

    Are you suppose to carry five things around?. They cost more that the iPad. Simple math. iPad continues to be the better product in its category.

  • Ken

    My wife has an iPad, most worthless thing I have ever seen in my in life. People are right, it does everything, but it doesn’t do it very well. I agree with the article. I have a Kindle, a laptop, and a camera. They all do a much better job at their specialty then an iPAD.

  • Pete

    Definitely agree with others: this is one of the most absurd articles I’ve ever read. Would someone who is interested in photography and wanted a camera seriously buy an iPad to do that?

    The Kindle? It works well and has less eye strain, but it doesn’t offer color or keyword search.

    And who wants a device to ONLY search the web? I want to meet such a person and look them in the eye.

    Does the author also think that someone will go out and buy an iPad just to listen to music?

    We’re all collectively dumber for having read this article.

  • rforexdad

    Here is my thoughts.

    I would prefer an article which says
    Yes…these are the 20 things that I-Pad can do and here is a cheaper product which can do 18 things…

    why not compare I-pad with another tablet like the Android tablets…there are more than 10 of these…

    I would like an article on this theme…!!!

  • mark

    worst article ever. who allowed this to be publsished? this person should be fired.

  • Steven

    This article is hilarious. It is seriosuly on par with an April fools joke.

  • vicky duran

    oh jennifer, 90% of ipads were and are used 90% in bed, owners sleep quite close to them…how can you intrude and suggest to “ditch” this upgrading relationship??? stick to fashion writing, “ditch” responsible financing. when you sleep well, you make more money. to your credit, you have i think doubled the interest to ipad sales and saved millions to be spent on other gadgets. Apple, Inc. should reward you.

  • John Greg

    I read the article with interest & totally got Jennifer’s simple point, first time. While I won’t use the specific alternative suggestions given in the article, it helped clarify the PRINCIPLE that you should THINK about what you personally NEED, and if it’s only one or two functions, then there may be a cheaper device that does the job better. This may seem obvious, but when you’re in the valley of decision, and receiving heavy pressure (from friends & hype)to follow the flock, this type of article hits the spot. Thanks.

Best Savings Rates

Institution
Featured Rate (APY)
0.84%
Savings
0.85%
Savings
Institution
Best Rate (APY)
Pioneer Muslim Federal Credit Union
2.52%
Savings Account
Rutherford Postal District Employees Federal Credit Union
2.52%
Savings Account
Houston Police Credit Union
2.02%
Savings Account
Free, all-inclusive, and truly local: GoBankingRates.com is the only source for interest rates from over 5000 banks and credit unions
AdSpeed – GBR – Default – Articles – RR2 Financial Resources Right Rail
AddThis Trending Article Widget
Blank Space