Social Security Revenue Decreased Because of Wage Inequality

Front view of eldery man landscaping and taking care of plants in garden.
SerhiiBobyk / Getty Images/iStockphoto

Seniors in the United States have long depended on Social Security to fund part or all of their retirements, but the program in its current form can’t sustain itself much longer. Unless steps are taken to provide more funding, Social Security benefits will have to be reduced by the middle of next decade.

See: Social Security Benefits Might Get Cut Early — What Does It Mean for You?
Find: 7 Things Every Woman Should Know About Social Security

The reason is simple: Social Security benefits are paid from dedicated trust funds that are mainly funded by payroll taxes. As previously reported by GOBankingRates, the 2021 Social Security Trustees report revealed that the trust funds will be able to cover all benefits until 2034. After that, retirees will only receive 78% of the full benefit they expected if Congress doesn’t find a way to fix the funding issues.

One of the main problems is rising wage inequality, according to the Center for American Progress, an independent, nonpartisan policy institute.

In a recent report, the CAP noted that nearly all of Social Security’s revenue comes from a federal payroll tax of 12.4% on a workers’ first $147,000 of annual wages. The tax is split in two parts, with the first 6.2% paid by workers and the second 6.2% paid by employers. Americans who are self-employed pay the full 12.4%.

See: 5 Things Most Americans Don’t Know About Side Hustles and Taxes

Retire Comfortably

Taxes withheld for Social Security can be a big financial burden for lower earners, with about two-thirds of Americans paying more in payroll taxes than in income taxes. But because wages above $147,000 are not subject to Social Security taxes, high-earning Americans are essentially exempt from Social Security taxes after hitting that threshold.

For example, someone who earns $1 million a year only has to contribute taxes to the Social Security system through about the third week of February. For the rest of the year, the earnings are no longer subject to the tax.

The taxable maximum is raised every year to reflect overall wage growth. Maximum taxable earnings for Social Security payroll taxes were $118,500 in 2016, then rose to $128,400 in 2018 and $137,700 in 2020 before reaching $147,000 in 2022.

Find: The Rich Are Costing Social Security Billions a Year

The problem, as the CAP pointed out, is that average wages have not grown as fast as wages for higher earners. Since 1983, the share of untaxed earnings has risen from 10% to nearly 17.5%.

“This dramatic increase means that the Social Security payroll tax misses a substantial and growing amount of potential revenue,” the Center for American Progress wrote.

Retire Comfortably

Most of the increase is due to a big rise in the wage share of the top 1% of earners. Between 1983 and 2020, the share of overall earnings going to the highest percentile of wage earners rose from 8.8% to 13.5%. More than 60% of the increase in untaxed earnings over the last four decades is directly attributable to the top 1% of earners.

See: 15 Worst States To Live on Just a Social Security Check

While low- and middle-income earners pay the full tax on their entire salaries, the highest earners might pay it on only a small percentage of their income. This makes the payroll tax “deeply regressive,” according to the CAP.

“High-wage earners have greater potential to invest and save for retirement, whereas low- and middle-wage earners do not have the same luxury, forcing them to rely more heavily on Social Security,” the CAP report added. “Therefore, it is counterproductive to deprive Social Security of revenues precisely when wages decline for those most in need.”

The way to correct this problem, of course, is to apply the Social Security tax to all wages rather than cutting it off at $147,000 or any other figure. According to the CAP report, eliminating the payroll tax cap without changing Social Security’s benefit structure would close about 73% of the program’s funding shortfall.

Even applying the payroll tax to wages over $400,000, as proposed in the Social Security 2100 Act, would impact only 4% of wage earners while eliminating more than two thirds of Social Security’s long-run funding shortfall.

More From GOBankingRates

About the Author

Vance Cariaga is a London-based writer, editor and journalist who previously held staff positions at Investor’s Business Daily, The Charlotte Business Journal and The Charlotte Observer. His work also appeared in Charlotte Magazine, Street & Smith’s Sports Business Journal and Business North Carolina magazine. He holds a B.A. in English from Appalachian State University and studied journalism at the University of South Carolina. His reporting earned awards from the North Carolina Press Association, the Green Eyeshade Awards and AlterNet. In addition to journalism, he has worked in banking, accounting and restaurant management. A native of North Carolina who also writes fiction, Vance’s short story, “Saint Christopher,” placed second in the 2019 Writer’s Digest Short Short Story Competition. Two of his short stories appear in With One Eye on the Cows, an anthology published by Ad Hoc Fiction in 2019. His debut novel, Voodoo Hideaway, was published in 2021 by Atmosphere Press.

Best Bank Accounts of July 2022

Untitled design (1)
Close popup The GBR Closer icon

Sending you timely financial stories that you can bank on.

Sign up for our daily newsletter for the latest financial news and trending topics.

Loading...
Please enter an email.
Please enter a valid email address.
There was an unknown error. Please try again later.

For our full Privacy Policy, click here.