How Much Home Equity Should a Social Security-Only Retiree Consider Tapping?
Written by
Jordan Rosenfeld
Edited by
Molly Sullivan
Commitment to Our Readers
GOBankingRates' editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methodologies to evaluate financial products and services - our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our products and services review methodology.
20 Years
Helping You Live Richer
Reviewed
by Experts
Trusted by
Millions of Readers
Many retirees who rely primarily or entirely on Social Security assume their home equity is a financial safety net they can tap when monthly income falls short. But mortgage and real estate experts say that assumption can be dangerous without a clear plan, especially as taxes, insurance and healthcare costs rise faster than benefits.
Here are expert-backed considerations for how much home equity Social Security-only retirees should consider tapping, if any, and when other options may be safer.
How Much Equity Is Too Much To Tap?
While many retirees assume lenders set safe limits, those limits may still be unrealistic for people living on Social Security alone.
Cody Schuiteboer, president and CEO of Best Interest Financial, has a rule of thumb: “Never tap more than 20% of your home equity, and only if the debt can be serviced from non-Social Security income.” Otherwise, on an already tight budget, adding debt service can put long-term financial stability at risk.
When Home Equity Even Enters the Conversation
For most retirees, they don’t think about tapping home equity until fixed income no longer stretches far enough to cover rising costs. Experts say this moment often arrives gradually rather than all at once, triggered by property taxes, insurance, healthcare bills or major repairs.
Equity discussions, though they vary from person to person, usually begin “when you no longer have the capability to live comfortably on the income coming in alone,” according to Rose Krieger, senior home loan specialist at Churchill Mortgage. Then it may be time to look into other options.
Mindy Price, broker at eXp Realty, sees the same pressure points when monthly costs start to feel heavy. Rising property taxes, insurance, healthcare or a major repair can change what earlier felt manageable, she pointed out. “Even without a mortgage, the home itself can become hard to afford comfortably.”
The Biggest Mistake Retirees Make
While having home equity can feel reassuring, experts emphasized that it is still debt, often expensive debt. “Retirees on Social Security make a dangerous mistake — they treat home equity as an emergency fund without understanding the costs of accessing it,” Schuiteboer said.
He explained the math many borrowers overlook: “Home equity is a loan, and in today’s market, that can mean an annual fee of 8% to 12%. So, a $100,000 home equity loan can mean $8,000 to $12,000 in yearly interest.”
That money has to come from somewhere, he noted, either retirement savings or Social Security itself.
Rising Property Taxes, Insurance and Maintenance Concerns
Borrowing against a home does not freeze its ongoing costs. In fact, rising costs often turn manageable loans into long-term financial traps. Krieger cautioned that affordability does not end with loan approval. “The biggest financial risk is being able to make the payments, which include increasing homeowners’ insurance and property tax costs.”
Schuiteboer explained that these costs can quickly compound. “For older retirees, home equity borrowing can become a financial trap as property taxes and insurance costs rise.”
Before borrowing, he recommended retirees calculate their total annual carrying costs, including property tax, insurance and projected maintenance, “which costs 1% to 2% of the home value annually.”
Reverse Mortgages vs. HELOCs vs. Cash-Out Refinances
Not all equity tools function the same way. For retirees who are income-poor but asset-rich, the structure of the loan often matters more than the interest rate.
Reverse mortgages can appeal to some Social Security-dependent households, Krieger said. “These are loans that do not require a monthly mortgage payment, so it can be a great option for those that are fully dependent on Social Security.”
Schuiteboer agreed that in the current economic environment, reverse mortgages for retirees ages 65 and older are “a genuine alternative to traditional home equity lines of credit.”
Cash-out refinances for Social Security-only retirees are also rarely appropriate, he noted, because they extend the debt timeline and require qualification income that most retirees do not have.
When Downsizing Makes More Sense Than Borrowing
For many retirees, selling the home outright can reduce financial risk. But timing is critical. Price explained that downsizing tends to work best when it happens before it feels urgent and while enough equity remains to make a move worthwhile.
“Timing matters,” she said. “Downsizing earlier usually preserves options and reduces stress.”
Schuiteboer called downsizing the “far more rational” option than borrowing. “Selling that home and purchasing a lower-cost property free and clear would free up cash and lower property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs permanently.”
Warning Signs You’re Relying Too Heavily on Home Equity
How retirees use their equity matters as much as how much is borrowed. Schuiteboer warned that using equity to cover everyday expenses is a clear red flag. “If a retiree under Social Security alone borrows money to pay for property taxes and insurance, she can no longer afford the home, period.”
For Social Security-only retirees, home equity should be approached as a last-resort financial tool, not a primary income solution. Ideally, your home should provide financial freedom in retirement, not take it away.
As Schuiteboer put it, “The home is your last financial bastion. Once you breach that with debt, it becomes much more difficult to repair.”
More From GOBankingRates
