Advertiser Disclosure

The Best Cities for Middle-Class Families in Every State

June 25, 2024

5 min Read

Written by Gabrielle Olya

Edited by Joe Evans

Commitment to Our Readers

GOBankingRates' editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methodologies to evaluate financial products and services - our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our products and services review methodology.

20 YearsHelping You Live Richer

Reviewed by Experts

Trusted by Millions of Readers

Choosing where to raise a family is a big decision, and several factors affect the best place for you and your loved ones.

If you are a middle-class family, affordability and cost of living likely play a large role, and you will likely also consider things like the quality of local schools, quality and availability of healthcare, and recreation opportunities.

To find the best cities for middle-class families in every state, GOBankingRates found the most affordable city in each state selected by WalletHub as one of the best cities to raise a family. WalletHub’s ranking scored cities based on 45 metrics that fell into five categories: family fun, health and safety, education and child care, affordability and socioeconomics.

Here’s a look at the best cities for middle-class families in every state, based on the city with the best affordability ranking in each state.

Alabama: Huntsville

Affordability ranking: 45
Total score (out of a possible 100): 58.33

Alaska: Juneau

Affordability ranking: 63
Total score (out of a possible 100): 54.40

Arizona: Gilbert

Affordability ranking: 12
Total score (out of a possible 100): 64.02

Arkansas: Little Rock

Affordability ranking: 93
Total score (out of a possible 100): 42.70

California: Fremont

Affordability ranking: 11
Total score (out of a possible 100): 73.55

Colorado: Denver

Affordability ranking: 43
Total score (out of a possible 100): 56.84

Connecticut: New Haven

Affordability ranking: 156
Total score (out of a possible 100): 43.43

Delaware: Wilmington

Affordability ranking: 131
Total score (out of a possible 100): 42.93

Florida: St. Petersburg

Affordability ranking: 48
Total score (out of a possible 100): 55.19

Georgia: Atlanta

Affordability ranking: 30
Total score (out of a possible 100): 54.01

Hawaii: Pearl City

Affordability ranking: 73
Total score (out of a possible 100): 59.21

Idaho: Boise

Affordability ranking: 23
Total score (out of a possible 100): 63.34

Illinois: Aurora

Affordability ranking: 83
Total score (out of a possible 100): 54.99

Indiana: Fort Wayne

Affordability ranking: 60
Total score (out of a possible 100): 48.68

Iowa: Cedar Rapids

Affordability ranking: 6
Total score (out of a possible 100): 58.49

Kansas: Overland Park

Affordability ranking: 1
Total score (out of a possible 100): 70.11

Kentucky: Lexington

Affordability ranking: 25
Total score (out of a possible 100): 58.64

Louisiana: Baton Rouge

Affordability ranking: 97
Total score (out of a possible 100): 42.95

Maine: Portland

Affordability ranking: 44
Total score (out of a possible 100): 59.63

Maryland: Columbia

Affordability ranking: 2
Total score (out of a possible 100): 60.81

Massachusetts: Worcester

Affordability ranking: 102
Total score (out of a possible 100): 47.39

Michigan: Grand Rapids

Affordability ranking: 41
Total score (out of a possible 100): 51.88

Minnesota: Minneapolis

Affordability ranking: 3
Total score (out of a possible 100): 60.81

Mississippi: Jackson

Affordability ranking: 158
Total score (out of a possible 100): 39.90

Missouri: Kansas City

Affordability ranking: 46
Total score (out of a possible 100): 51.60

Montana: Billings

Affordability ranking: 27
Total score (out of a possible 100): 56.41

Nebraska: Lincoln

Affordability ranking: 16
Total score (out of a possible 100): 61.80

Nevada: Henderson

Affordability ranking: 62
Total score (out of a possible 100): 59.12

New Hampshire: Nashua

Affordability ranking: 34
Total score (out of a possible 100): 59.11

New Jersey: Jersey City

Affordability ranking: 96
Total score (out of a possible 100): 55.46

New Mexico: Albuquerque

Affordability ranking: 77
Total score (out of a possible 100): 46.67

New York: Buffalo

Affordability ranking: 51
Total score (out of a possible 100): 48.97

North Carolina: Raleigh

Affordability ranking: 10
Total score (out of a possible 100): 55.39

North Dakota: Bismarck

Affordability ranking: 4
Total score (out of a possible 100): 62.72

Ohio: Columbus

Affordability ranking: 37
Total score (out of a possible 100): 53.64

Oklahoma: Oklahoma City

Affordability ranking: 39
Total score (out of a possible 100): 54.32

Oregon: Portland

Affordability ranking: 36
Total score (out of a possible 100): 59.82

Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh

Affordability ranking: 22
Total score (out of a possible 100): 57.89

Rhode Island: Warwick

Affordability ranking: 20
Total score (out of a possible 100): 59.81

South Carolina: Charleston

Affordability ranking: 24
Total score (out of a possible 100): 62.53

South Dakota: Sioux Falls

Affordability ranking: 18
Total score (out of a possible 100): 60.88

Tennessee: Chattanooga

Affordability ranking: 53
Total score (out of a possible 100): 49.53

Texas: Plano

Affordability ranking: 7
Total score (out of a possible 100): 68.05

Utah: Salt Lake City

Affordability ranking: 40
Total score (out of a possible 100): 55.27

Vermont: South Burlington

Affordability ranking: 33
Total score (out of a possible 100): 58.56

Virginia: Chesapeake

Affordability ranking: 31
Total score (out of a possible 100): 60.31

Washington: Seattle

Affordability ranking: 8
Total score (out of a possible 100): 64.14

West Virginia: Charleston

Affordability ranking: 35
Total score (out of a possible 100): 47.66

Wisconsin: Madison

Affordability ranking: 5
Total score (out of a possible 100): 62.18

Wyoming: Cheyenne

Affordability ranking: 21
Total score (out of a possible 100): 55.72

Data is sourced from WalletHub and is accurate as of May 28, 2024.

More From GOBankingRates