I’m a Financial Planner: Why You Should Never Buy a House in These 6 Cities
Commitment to Our Readers
GOBankingRates' editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methodologies to evaluate financial products and services - our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our products and services review methodology.
20 Years
Helping You Live Richer
Reviewed
by Experts
Trusted by
Millions of Readers
Buying a home can be a very solid investment and amass wealth for generations. The flipside is that some cities have real estate markets that make it very hard or impossible to come out on top financially.
Everything from low demand to population declines can make a city not desirable to real estate investors. GOBankingRates reached out to finance experts to get their takes on the worst cities to buy homes in.
Read on to find out why these cities are problematic.
San Francisco, California
David Kindness is a certified public accountant (CPA) and personal finance writer at Best Money. He commented that high prices and a mass exodus of residents make San Francisco a dubious city to buy property in.
“Home prices are sky-high — over $1.3 million in many cases — but demand isn’t what it used to be. The population’s not growing, more people are moving out, and combined with California’s tax structure, the total cost of ownership keeps climbing.”
New York City, New York
Like San Francisco, the Big Apple has seen its population go down since the pandemic, but homes are still incredibly expensive.
Steven Kibbel, a certified financial planner and financial advisor at Prop Firm App, warned that mortgages aren’t the only high price real estate investors will be paying in New York City.
“It has high property tax rates, slow growth in terms of people and high maintenance costs, particularly in co-ops or structures with old systems in place,” Kibbel explained. “It’s difficult to support the buy unless it’s purely for a lifestyle decision.”
Los Angeles, California
Kindness cautioned buyers looking to make money off the LA rental market, commenting that it might be harder to do than it seems.
“The high prices for properties costing at least $800,000 fail to deliver attractive rental returns,” Kindness added. “An initial appearance of profitability through property analysis becomes unprofitable upon total expense calculation.”
Chicago, Illinois
Property taxes are high in Chicago. Paired with a pricey mortgage, owning a home in Chicago can be cost-prohibitive.
“Residential property taxes in Chicago rank among the highest nationally,” Kindness commented. “The decreasing population negatively affects the local demand levels. People who own properties in Chicago might face years of minimal market value increase while paying substantial annual tax bills.”
Miami, Florida
Kindness said that, even though Miami is one of the hotter real estate markets right now, some investors might not realize just how great the flood risk is.
“Flood insurance keeps going up, and the closer you get to the coast, the more exposure you have to rising water and storms,” he noted.
Kindness added that because prices have gone up so quickly, they’re liable to crash just as quickly.
“It’s unpredictable and very sensitive to market hype,” he said.
Austin, Texas
Kibbel cautioned against buying Austin because of the high property taxes.
“The biggest surprise for most of my clients is the property tax load in Texas,” he said. “Folks relocate there for no state income tax but are then hit with local taxes that are significantly higher than they anticipated. It negates most of the benefit.”
Written by
Edited by 


















