If Social Security Were Privatized, Here Are 7 Pros and Cons for Your Money
Written by
Jordan Rosenfeld
Edited by
Molly Sullivan
Commitment to Our Readers
GOBankingRates' editorial team is committed to bringing you unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methodologies to evaluate financial products and services - our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our products and services review methodology.
20 Years
Helping You Live Richer
Reviewed
by Experts
Trusted by
Millions of Readers
The future of Social Security is a frequent topic of debate, with some experts warning the program’s trust fund could be depleted within the next decade. Add to that the uncertainty surrounding potential changes under President Donald Trump’s administration, and many Americans are left wondering what’s next for the country’s safety net.
One possibility that’s gained renewed attention: privatization. This could mean shifting part of Social Security from a guaranteed government benefit to individual investment accounts — placing more responsibility on retirees to manage their own funds.
So what would that mean for your retirement?
Pro: Greater Control Over Your Funds
If privatization were to occur, shifting part of Social Security from a guaranteed government benefit to individual investment accounts, it would place greater responsibility on the individual to track and invest their own funds, according to Christopher Stroup, CFP and owner of Silicon Beach Financial.
“Instead of relying solely on a fixed payout, future retirees could direct a portion of their payroll taxes into personal retirement portfolios. This would introduce more market exposure, flexibility and individual responsibility into what is now a shared, pooled system,” he said.
For people who want greater control over their funds, privatization could offer that and more.
Pro: Higher Returns
Privatization could also offer higher potential returns, especially for younger, higher-earning individuals, by allowing personal investments in the stock market, Stroup said.
It may also increase transparency, control and ownership over retirement assets.
Pro: Increased Flexibility
In addition to increased control and the potential for higher returns, another potential benefit of privatization for individual retirement savers could be increased flexibility, according to Aaron Razon, a personal finance expert at Coupon Snake.
“With privatization, individuals would have more options than the traditional benefits provided by Social Security, and with these increased flexible options allowing them to choose their investment options, benefit structure and retirement age, they would be able to tailor their retirement savings and investment strategies accordingly,” he explained.
Another benefit of privatization for individual retirement savers is what Razon called “ownership and portability,” which could be appealing to individuals whose career path has been nontraditional.
Con: Volatility
The biggest risk to privatization is volatility, Stroup said. “Privatization could erode the safety net for retirees who don’t have substantial savings or investment experience.”
Without guaranteed monthly benefits, those depending heavily on Social Security could face shortfalls if markets decline, especially near or during retirement, he explained. “That’s a dangerous bet for many Americans.”
Con: Investments Are Tied To the Stock Market
A privatized system ties benefits to investment outcomes, meaning your retirement security could rise or fall with market swings, Stroup said. The past couple weeks of market volatility have demonstrated that that could equal significant losses.
“This approach may appeal to seasoned investors, but it shifts the burden of performance risk away from the government and squarely onto individuals,” Stroup warned. This could increase both opportunity and uncertainty.
Con: Worsening Inequality for Lower-Income Individuals
A big con of privatization is that lower-income individuals typically lack the financial margin to invest aggressively or recover from downturns, Stroup said.
“A privatized system could widen retirement inequality as those without extra capital or financial literacy may underfund their accounts or make poor investment decisions.”
He warned this could lead to less stability and greater vulnerability in retirement.
Con: It Could Destabilize Current Retirees
While privatization might offer up front benefits, it risks destabilizing the pay-as-you-go structure that funds current retirees, Razon explained
“Privatizing Social Security, especially now, could result in significant disruption to [retirees’] financial stability,” Razon explained. This could also add financial stress around managing their investments and making informed decisions regarding their retirement savings.
“With this struggle comes an increased chance that they will end up making the wrong choices which could lead to the gradual and eventual depletion of their retirement savings,” Razon said.
Save as Though There Is No Social Security
Though the Trump administration has not stated any intent to privatize Social Security, Stroup said it’s still a good time to start building “optionality” by saving in tax-advantaged accounts (like Roth IRAs and solo 401(k) plans), diversifying your income streams and revisiting your retirement assumptions.
Work with a fiduciary advisor to create a flexible, proactive financial plan that doesn’t rely solely on Social Security, regardless of what direction policy takes.
More From GOBankingRates
